Determinants of Caesarean Section Delivery Among Mothers: Evidence from a Cross-Sectional Study in a Private Maternity Hospital in Medan, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22475/jca.v1i1.32Keywords:
Caesarean section, Maternal factors, Premature rupture of membranes, Preeclampsia, Gestational ageAbstract
The increasing rate of Caesarean Section (CS) delivery has become a global concern, particularly in private healthcare settings where non-medical factors may influence decision-making. Understanding maternal determinants is essential to optimize delivery practices and reduce unnecessary procedures. Objectives: This study aimed to identify maternal factors associated with CS delivery among mothers in a private maternity hospital in Medan. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using secondary data from medical records of 341 mothers who delivered at RSU Bunda Thamrin between January and December 2025. The dependent variable was CS, while independent variables included maternal age, gestational age, history of CS, preeclampsia, and premature rupture of membranes (PROM). Data were analyzed using Chi-square tests and multiple logistic regression to determine adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: A history of previous CS was the strongest predictor of CS (aOR=19.689; 95% CI: 2.589–149.737; p=0.004). Preeclampsia (aOR=5.396; 95% CI: 2.276–12.790; p<0.001) and PROM (aOR=9.005; 95% CI: 3.506–23.128; p<0.001) were also significantly associated with increased CS likelihood. Maternal age and gestational age showed no significant association. Conclusion: Clinical maternal complications, particularly previous CS, preeclampsia, and PROM, are key determinants of CS delivery. Strengthening antenatal care and risk-based management is essential to reduce unnecessary CS and improve maternal outcomes.
References
Ayres-de-Campos, D., Simon, A., Modi, N., Tudose, M., Saliba, E., Wielgos, M., Reyns, M., Athanasiadis, A., Stenback, P., Verlohren, S., Nikolova, G., Lopriore, E., Yurtsal, B., Pellicer, A., Ramenghi, L., & Jacobsson, B. (2024). European Association of Perinatal Medicine (EAPM) European Midwives Association(EMA) Joint position statement: Caesarean delivery rates at a country level should be in the 15-20 % range. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 294, 76–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.01.005
Belladiena, A. N., Ashari, A., Kusumawati, N., Wibowo, S. S., Wulandari, F., Hadi, H. P., & Setiawan, A. (2025). Determining Factors in Choosing a Caesarean Section: The Role of Health Financing and Availability of Health Facilities in Indonesia. International Journal Of Health Science, 5(3), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.55606/ijhs.v5i3.6081
Cipta Wardhani, G. P. & Pudji Lestari. (2024). Maternal Reason for Choosing Caesarean Section at Won Request and Without Medical Indication: A Literature Review. Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health Research, 5(2), 208–215. https://doi.org/10.20473/jcmphr.v5i2.53489
Khadse, R. P. (2024). Analysis of socio-economic factors influencing caesarean section rates in Maharashtra, India. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 13(4), 916–921. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20240787
Mersha, A., & Shibiru, S. (2024). Cesarean Section: Short- and Long-Term Consequences. In G. Androutsopoulos (Ed.), Advances in Caesarean Section—Techniques, Complications, and Future Considerations. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.114382
Syed Qasim Shah, M. A. K. J., Fizza Ashfaq, Aisha Taj, Shah Muhammad Khan, Hamidullah,. (2023). Psychosocial and Emotional Factors Influencing the Choice between Cesarean Section and Natural Birth. Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences, 17(12), 502. https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs020231712502
Zahroh, R. I., Hazfiarini, A., Martiningtyas, M. A., Ekawati, F. M., Emilia, O., Cheong, M., Betran, A. P., Homer, C. S., & Bohren, M. A. (2024). Rising caesarean section rates and factors affecting women’s decision-making about mode of birth in Indonesia: A longitudinal qualitative study. BMJ Global Health, 9(6), e014602. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014602





Journal of the Clinical Ascent